Skip to main content
SearchLoginLogin or Signup

Works cited

Published onApr 30, 2022
Works cited

Please note that this report’s bibliography is also available as an open Zotero collection ‘Towards Better Practices (WP4 2022 report)’ and as a downloadable BibTeX file (below).

Works cited

Adema, J. (2014, November 18). Embracing Messiness: Open access offers the chance to creatively experiment with scholarly publishing. Impact of Social Sciences.

Adema, J. (2021). Living Books: Experiments in the Posthumanities. MIT Press.

Adema, J., & Moore, S. A. (2018). Collectivity and collaboration: Imagining new forms of communality to create resilience in scholar-led publishing. Insights, 31(0), 3.

Adema, J., & Moore, S. A. (2021). Scaling Small; Or How to Envision New Relationalities for Knowledge Production. Westminster Papers in Communication and Culture, 16(1).

Adema, J., & Stone, G. (2017). Changing Publishing Ecologies: A Landscape Study of New University Presses and Academic-Led Publishing.

Aguado López, E., & Becerril García, A. (2019, November 6). Latin America’s longstanding open access ecosystem could be undermined by proposals from the Global North. LSE Latin America and Caribbean Blog.

Aguado López, E., & Becerril García, A. (2020, May 20). The commercial model of academic publishing underscoring Plan S weakens the existing open access ecosystem in Latin America. Impact of Social Sciences.

Albornoz, D., Huang, M., Martin, I. M., Mateus, M., Touré, A. Y., & Chan, L. (2018, June 15). Framing Power: Tracing Key Discourses in Open Science Policies. 22nd International Conference on Electronic Publishing. 22nd International Conference on Electronic Publishing.

Albornoz, D., Okune, A., & Chan, L. (2020). Can Open Scholarly Practices Redress Epistemic Injustice? In M. P. Eve & J. Gray (Eds.), Reassembling Scholarly Communications: Histories, Infrastructures, and Global Politics of Open Access. The MIT Press.

Arp, L. G., & Forbes, M. (2018). It Takes a Village: Open Source Software Sustainability A Guidebook for Programs Serving Cultural and Scientific Heritage. Lyrasis/Institute of Museum and Library Services.

Barlow, J. (2016, June 28). What Constitutes a Quorum?. Board Portal Software | BoardEffect UK.

Barnes, L., & Gatti, R. (2019, June). Bibliodiversity in Practice: Developing Community-Owned, Open Infrastructures to Unleash Open Access Publishing. ELPUB 2019 23rd Edition of the International Conference on Electronic Publishing.

Behrens, J., & Deseriis, M. (2015, October 9). Liquid Democracy, its Challenges and its Forebears. OpenDemocracy.

Bilder, G. (2015, December 30). The Enclosure of Scholarly Infrastructure. OpenCon 2015.

Bilder, G., Lin, J., & Neylon, C. (2015). Principles for Open Scholarly Infrastructures-v1.

Bilder, G., Lin, J., & Neylon, C. (2020). The Principles of Open Scholarly Infrastructure.

Blum, C., & Zuber, C. I. (2016). Liquid Democracy: Potentials, Problems, and Perspectives: Liquid Democracy. Journal of Political Philosophy, 24(2), 162–182.

Bookchin, M. (2015). The Next Revolution: Popular Assemblies and the Promise of Direct Democracy (D. Bookchin & B. Taylor, Eds.). Verso.

Bourg, C., & Levy, R. (2021, March 18). MIT Libraries and Faculty Committee on the Library System on UC-Elsevier Deal. MIT Libraries News & Events.

Budroni, P., Claude-Burgelman, J., & Schouppe, M. (2019). Architectures of Knowledge: The European Open Science Cloud. ABI Technik, 39(2), 130–141.

Campfens, Y. (2021, October 7). OA Switchboard’s self-assessment of the Principles of Open Scholarly Infrastructure (POSI). OA Switchboard Blog.

CARE Principles of Indigenous Data Governance. (n.d.). Global Indigenous Data Alliance. Retrieved 27 March 2022, from

Carroll, L. (1884). The Principles of Parliamentary Representation. Harrison and Sons.

Chamberlain, A. (2020, October 4). Why is governance soooo boring?! The Institute of Association Leadership.

Chan, L. (2019, April 30). Platform Capitalism and the Governance of Knowledge Infrastructure. Digital Initiative Symposium, University of San Diego.

Chan, L., Hall, B., Piron, F., Tandon, R., & Williams, W. L. (2020). Open Science Beyond Open Access: For and with communities,  A step towards the decolonization of knowledge. Canadian Commission for UNESCO.

Chen, G., Posada, A., & Chan, L. (2019). Vertical Integration in Academic Publishing: Implications for Knowledge Inequality. In P. Mounier (Ed.), Connecting the Knowledge Commons—From Projects to Sustainable Infrastructure: The 22nd International Conference on Electronic Publishing – Revised Selected Papers. OpenEdition Press.

Chen, G. (Zhiwen), Mewa, T., Albornoz, D., & Huang, M. (2018). Geopolitical Inequalities Behind “Open” Infrastructures for Academic Knowledge Production. In G. (Zhiwen) Chen, Á. O. Álvarez Solís, G. Méndez Cota, M. Huang, D. Albornoz, T. Mewa, & Culture Machine (Eds.), The Geopolitics of Open (pp. 6–15). Post Office Press, Rope Press, and Culture Machine.

Clough, P. T., & Willse, C. (Eds.). (2011). Beyond Biopolitics: Essays on the Governance of Life and Death. Duke University Press.

Cocks, C. (2019, December 19). Diversity and Equity in Publishing: Triangle Scholarly Communication Institute | The H-Net Book Channel | H-Net.

Coggins, N. L., Fosado, G. C., Henry, C., & Manaktala, G. (2020). Towards Inclusive Scholarly Publishing: Developments in the University Press Community. Insights the UKSG Journal, 33, 15.

Consensus Decision Making. (n.d.). Seeds for Change. Retrieved 1 May 2022, from

COPIM. (2021). COPIM Statement on the Corporate Acquisition of OA Infrastructure. Community-Led Open Publication Infrastructures for Monographs (COPIM).

Crotty, D. (2019, August 1). Building for the Long Term: Why Business Strategies are Needed for Community-Owned Infrastructure. The Scholarly Kitchen.

Crow, R. (2013). Sustainability of Open Access Services: Phase 3: The Collective Provision of Open Access Resources. Scholarly Publishing & Academic Resources Coalition.

De Angelis, M., & Stavrides, S. (2010). On the Commons: A Public Interview with Massimo De Angelis and Stavros Stavrides. E-Flux, 17.

Debat, H., & Babini, D. (2020). Plan S in Latin America: A Precautionary Note. Scholarly and Research Communication, 11(1), 12–12.

Dunbar-Hester, C. (2019). Hacking Diversity: The Politics of Inclusion in Open Technology Cultures. Princeton University Press.

Duşa, A., Nelle, D., Stock, G., & Wagner, G. G. (Eds.). (2014). Facing the Future: European Research Infrastructures for the Humanities and Social Sciences. Scivero Verl.

Eliot, T. S. (1920). The Sacred Wood: Essays on Poetry and Criticism. Methuen & Co. Ltd.

Elwell, J., Emery, J., Hawkins, K., Kemp, J., Watkinson, C., Skinner, K., & Drummond, C. (2021). OAeBU Data Trust: 2022-2025 Governance Documentation for Initial Board of Trustees.

Enkhbayar, A. (2021, October 6). Beyond Open: Key Criteria to Assess Open Infrastructure. Invest in Open Infrastructure.

European Commission. (2017). EOSC Declaration. European Open Science Cloud. New Research & Innovation Opportunities. European Commission.

Eve, M. P., & Gray, J. (Eds.). (2020). Reassembling Scholarly Communications: Histories, Infrastructures, and Global Politics of Open Access. The MIT Press.

Fitzpatrick, K. (2019). Generous Thinking. Johns Hopkins University Press.

Fogel, K. (2022). Producing Open Source Software: How to Run a Successful Free Software Project (2nd edition). O’Reilly Media.

Frischmann, B. M., Madison, M. J., & Strandburg, K. J. (Eds.). (2014). Governing Knowledge Commons. Oxford University Press.

Fyfe, A., Coate, K., Curry, S., Lawson, S., Moxham, N., & Røstvik, C. M. (2017). Untangling Academic Publishing: A History of the Relationship Between Commercial Interests, Academic Prestige and the Circulation of Research. Zenodo.

Gatti, R. (2018, October 5). Why OBP is not participating in KU Open Funding: And why libraries should understand the reasons. Open Book Publishers Blog.

Graeber, D. (2004). Fragments of an Anarchist Anthropology. Prickly Paradigm Press : Distributed by University of Chicago Press.

Graeber, D. (2007). Possibilities: Essays on Hierarchy, Rebellion, and Desire. AK Press.

Graeber, D. (2011). Revolutions in Reverse: Essays on Politics, Violence, Art, and Imagination. Autonomedia.

Graeber, D. (2017). A Response to Anastasia Piliavsky’s The Wrong Kind of Freedom? A Review of David Graeber’s The Utopia of Rules: On Technology, Stupidity and the Secret Joys of Bureaucracy (Brooklyn/London: Melville House, 2015, 261 pages). International Journal of Politics, Culture, and Society, 30(1), 113–118.

Hall, G. (2021). Postdigital Politics: Or, How To Be An Anti-Bourgeois Theorist. Zenodo.

Hanganu, G. (2013, May 9). Voting in Meritocratic Governance Projects. OSS Watch.

Harney, S., & Moten, F. (2013). The Undercommons: Fugitive Planning & Black Study. Minor Compositions.

Hawthorne, S. (2014). Bibliodiversity: A Manifesto for Independent Publishing. Spinifex Press.

Hudson-Ward, A. (2021, March 30). The Missed Moment to Elevate Open Access as DEIA Imperative. Choice 360.

IMLS Grant ‘It Takes A Village’: Open Source Software Models of Collaboration & Sustainability. (n.d.). Retrieved 27 March 2022, from

Invest In Open Infrastructure. (2022). Defining Open Scholarly Infrastructure.

Irfanullah, H. (2022, January 24). The Other Diversity in Scholarly Publishing. The Scholarly Kitchen.

Jameson, F. (2004). The Politics of Utopia. New Left Review, 25, 35–54.

Joseph, H. (2018). Securing Community-Controlled Infrastructure: SPARC’s Plan of Action. College & Research Libraries News, 79(8).

Joseph, M. (2002). Against The Romance Of Community. University of Minnesota Press.

Joseph-Salisbury, R., & Connelly, L. (2021). Anti-Racist Scholar-Activism. Manchester University Press.

Joy, E. (2013, November 19). A Time for Radical Hope: Freedom, Responsibility, Publishing, and Building New Publics. In the Middle.

Kember, S. (2014). Opening Out from Open Access: Writing and Publishing in Response to Neoliberalism. Ada: A Journal of Gender, New Media, and Technology.

Knöchelmann, M. (2018, October 3). Knowledge Unlatched, Failed Transparency, and the Commercialisation of Open Access Book Publishing. LSE Impact Blog.

Larivière, V., Haustein, S., & Mongeon, P. (2015). The Oligopoly of Academic Publishers in the Digital Era. PLOS ONE, 10(6).

Lattemann, C., & Stieglitz, S. (2005). Framework for Governance in Open Source Communities. Proceedings of the 38th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

Lewis, D. W. (2017). The 2.5% Commitment.

Lewis, D. W., Goetsch, L., Graves, D., & Roy, M. (2018). Funding community controlled open infrastructure for scholarly communication: The 2.5% commitment initiative. College & Research Libraries News, 79(3).

Lewis, D. W., Roy, M., & Skinner, K. (2018). The First Step Towards a System of Open Digital Scholarly Communication Infrastructure.

LIBER. (2017, September 7). Open Access: Five Principles for Negotiations with Publishers. LIBER Europe.

LIBER, & Campbell, C. (2022, April 1). Four Urgent Recommendations for Open Access Negotiations with Publishers. LIBER Europe.

LIBER Citizen Science Working Group. (2021). Citizen Science Skilling for Library Staff, Researchers, and the Public. LIBER Citizen Science Working Group.

Lipmanowicz, H., & McCandless, K. (n.d.). Social Network Webbing. Liberating Structures.

Maryl, M., Błaszczyńska, M., Szulińska, A., & Rams, P. (2020). The Case for an Inclusive Scholarly Communication Infrastructure for Social Sciences and Humanities. F1000Research, 9, 1265.

Moore, S. A. (2020, April 17). Without stronger academic governance, Covid-19 will concentrate the corporate control of academic publishing. LSE Blog.

Moore, S. A. (2021a). Exploring Models for Community Governance. Zenodo.

Moore, S. A. (2021b). Open Access, Plan S and ‘Radically Liberatory’ Forms of Academic Freedom. Development and Change, 52(6).

Moore, S. A., & Adema, J. (2020a). Community Governance Explored. Community-Led Open Publication Infrastructures for Monographs (COPIM).

Moore, S. A., & Adema, J. (2020b). COPIM Community Governance Workshop Recap: Part 1. Community-Led Open Publication Infrastructures for Monographs (COPIM).

Moore, S. A., & Adema, J. (2020c). COPIM Community Governance Workshop Recap: Part 2 - On the Meaning of Community. Community-Led Open Publication Infrastructures for Monographs (COPIM).

Moore, S. A., Gray, J., & Lämmerhirt, D. (2016). Pasteur 40A briefing paper: Infrastructures for open scholarly communication. Pasteur4OA.

Montgomery, L., Hartley, John, Neylon, Cameron, Gillies, Malcolm, Gray, Eve, Herrmann-Pillath, Carsten, Leach, Joan, Potts, Jason, Ren, Xiang, Skinner, Katherine, Sugimoto, Cassidy R., & Wilson, K., Huang, Chun-Kai. (2021). Policy. In Open Knowledge Institutions Reinventing Universities. MIT Press.

Morka, A., & Gatti, R. (2021). Academic Libraries and Open Access Books in Europe. A Landscape Study. COPIM & OPERAS. &

Moten, F., & Harney, S. (2011). Blackness and Governance. In P. T. Clough & C. Willse (Eds.), Beyond Biopolitics (pp. 351–361). Duke University Press.

Mouffe, C. (2005). The Return of the Political. Verso.

Mounier, P., Ferwerda, E., Dumouchel, S., Gatti, R., Gingold, A., Radovic, D., Smaniotto, A., Stojanovski, J., Vries, S. de, & Waaijers, L. (2018). OPERAS Platforms and Services White Paper.

Mudditt, A. (2020, October 28). In Search of Equity and Justice: Reimagining Scholarly Communication. The Scholarly Kitchen.

National Open Science Plan. (2019, April 17). Exemplarity Criteria for Funding from the National Open Science Fund through Platforms, Infrastructures and Editorial content. Ouvrir La Science.

Noble, S. U. (2018). Algorithms of Oppression: How Search Engines Reinforce Racism. New York University Press.

Okune, A. (2019, May 29). Decolonizing Scholarly Data and Publishing Infrastructures. Africa at LSE.

Okune, A., Adebowale, S., Gray, E., Mumo, A., & Oniang’o, R. (2021). Conceptualizing, Financing and Infrastructuring: Perspectives on Open Access in and from Africa. Development and Change, 52(2).

Okune, A., Hillyer, R., Chan, L., Albornoz, D., & Posada, A. (2019). Whose Infrastructure? Towards Inclusive and Collaborative Knowledge Infrastructures in Open Science. In P. Mounier (Ed.), Connecting the Knowledge Commons—From Projects to Sustainable Infrastructure: The 22nd International Conference on Electronic Publishing – Revised Selected Papers. OpenEdition Press.

Open Source Alliance, & Hand, J. (2018). A Guide to Mission, Vision, and Strategy. In The Open Source Alliance for Open Scholarship Handbook.

Pawelzik, R., & Foulonneau, M. (2014). Governance Models for Online Communities—An Analysis of Communities Supporting Open Source Software Projects. ResearchGate.

Perens, B. (2005). The Emerging Economic Paradigm of Open Source. First Monday.

Peters, P. (2017, October 23). An Open Approach to Developing Infrastructure for Open Science. Hindawi.

Petrisin, A. (2018). Liquid Democracy and the Future of Governance. Kosmos Journal.

Pooley, J. (2017, August 15). Scholarly Communications shouldn’t just be Open, but Non-Profit too. Impact of Social Sciences.

Pooley, J. (2022). Surveillance Publishing. The Journal of Electronic Publishing, 25(1).

punctum books. (n.d.). Vision Statement.

Research Infrastructures in the Humanities: European Science Foundation. (n.d.).

Resnick, P. (2014). On Consensus and Humming in the IETF (Request for Comments RFC 7282). Internet Engineering Task Force.

Robinson, D. (2021, April 5). Developing Anti-Racist Nonprofit Governance. Code for Science & Society.

Ross-Hellauer, T. (2016, June 5). Infrastructure is Invisible / Infrastructure is Law. OpenAIRE Blog.

Ruckstuhl, K. (2022). Trust in Scholarly Communications and Infrastructure: Indigenous Data Sovereignty. Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics, 6.

Schafer, V., & Wieneke, L. (2021). OPERAS-P Deliverable D6.1: Report on innovative models of governance.

Schiener, D. (2015, November 23). Liquid Democracy: True Democracy for the 21st Century. Organizer Sandbox.

Schlosser, M., & Mitchell, C. (2019, February 6). Academy-Owned? Academic-Led? Community-Led? What’s at Stake in the Words we Use to Describe New Publishing Paradigms. Library Publishing Coalition Blog.

Schneider, F. (2010). (Extended) Footnotes On Education. E-Flux, 14.

Schneider, N. (2021). The Tyranny of openness: What happened to peer production? Feminist Media Studies, 0(0), 1–18.

Schroeder, R., & Siegel, G. (2006). A Cooperative Publishing Model for Sustainable Scholarship. Journal of Scholarly Publishing, 37(2), 86–98.

Sheeran, M. J. (1983). Beyond Majority Rule: Voteless Decisions in the Religious Society of Friends. Philadelphia Yearly Meeting of the Religious Society of Friends.

Shorish, Y., & Chan, L. (2019, October 22). Co-creating Open Infrastructure to Support Diversity and Equity. ScholarLed Blog.

Sivanandan, A. (1990). Communities of Resistance: Writings on Black Struggles for Socialism. Verso.

Skinner, K. (2019, July 23). Why Are So Many Scholarly Communication Infrastructure Providers Running a Red Queen’s Race? Educopia Institute.

Skinner, K., & Lippincott, S. (2020a). Assessment Checklist. CommonPlace.

Skinner, K., & Lippincott, S. (2020b). Values and Principles Framework and Assessment Checklist. Commonplace.

Skinner, K., & Wipperman, S. (2020). Living our Values and Principles: Exploring Assessment Strategies for the Scholarly Communication Field. Educopia Institute.

Star, S. L. (1999). The Ethnography of Infrastructure. American Behavioral Scientist, 43(3), 377–391.

Swartz, A. (2008). Guerilla Open Access Manifesto.

The Spokescouncil: A Decision-Making Pprocess for Large Groups. (n.d.). Seeds for Change.

Treloar, M. (2003, June). The Tyranny of Consensus. Clamor, 20, 38–40.

Tsing, A. L. (2017). The Mushroom at the End of the World: On the Possibility of Life in Capitalist Ruins. Princeton University Press.

Valsangiacomo, C. (2021). Clarifying and Defining the Concept of Liquid Democracy. Swiss Political Science Review, 28(1), 61–80.

van Gerven Oei, V. W. J. (2020, March 19). Viral Open Access in Times of a Global Pandemic. punctum papers.

Watkinson, C., & Pitts, M. (2021, February 22). Re-Envisioning Humanities Infrastructure. Inside Higher Ed.

Waugh, C., & Carlisle-Johnston, E. (2022, April 27). Openwashing in Open Spaces: A Review of the Literature. Concordia University Library Research Forum 2022, online.

Wipperman, S., Martin, S., & Bowley, C. (2018). Balancing Influence in a Shifting Scholarly Communication Landscape: Creating Library-Owned, Community-Aligned Infrastructure Through Individual, Local, and Community Action. College & Research Libraries News, 79(5), 244–247.


No comments here

Why not start the discussion?