Skip to main content
SearchLoginLogin or Signup

Works cited

Published onApr 30, 2022
Works cited
·

Please note that this report’s bibliography is also available as an open Zotero collection ‘Towards Better Practices (WP4 2022 report)’ and as a downloadable BibTeX file (below).

Works cited

Adema, J. (2014, November 18). Embracing Messiness: Open access offers the chance to creatively experiment with scholarly publishing. Impact of Social Sciences. https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2014/11/18/embracing-messiness-adema-pdsc14/

Adema, J. (2021). Living Books: Experiments in the Posthumanities. MIT Press.

Adema, J., & Moore, S. A. (2018). Collectivity and collaboration: Imagining new forms of communality to create resilience in scholar-led publishing. Insights, 31(0), 3. https://doi.org/10.1629/uksg.399

Adema, J., & Moore, S. A. (2021). Scaling Small; Or How to Envision New Relationalities for Knowledge Production. Westminster Papers in Communication and Culture, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.16997/wpcc.918

Adema, J., & Stone, G. (2017). Changing Publishing Ecologies: A Landscape Study of New University Presses and Academic-Led Publishing. https://repository.jisc.ac.uk/6666/

Aguado López, E., & Becerril García, A. (2019, November 6). Latin America’s longstanding open access ecosystem could be undermined by proposals from the Global North. LSE Latin America and Caribbean Blog. https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/latamcaribbean/2019/11/06/latin-americas-longstanding-open-access-ecosystem-could-be-undermined-by-proposals-from-the-global-north/

Aguado López, E., & Becerril García, A. (2020, May 20). The commercial model of academic publishing underscoring Plan S weakens the existing open access ecosystem in Latin America. Impact of Social Sciences. https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2020/05/20/the-commercial-model-of-academic-publishing-underscoring-plan-s-weakens-the-existing-open-access-ecosystem-in-latin-america/

Albornoz, D., Huang, M., Martin, I. M., Mateus, M., Touré, A. Y., & Chan, L. (2018, June 15). Framing Power: Tracing Key Discourses in Open Science Policies. 22nd International Conference on Electronic Publishing. 22nd International Conference on Electronic Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4000/proceedings.elpub.2018.23

Albornoz, D., Okune, A., & Chan, L. (2020). Can Open Scholarly Practices Redress Epistemic Injustice? In M. P. Eve & J. Gray (Eds.), Reassembling Scholarly Communications: Histories, Infrastructures, and Global Politics of Open Access. The MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/11885.003.0009

Arp, L. G., & Forbes, M. (2018). It Takes a Village: Open Source Software Sustainability A Guidebook for Programs Serving Cultural and Scientific Heritage. Lyrasis/Institute of Museum and Library Services. https://doi.org/10.48609/bp1g-6146

Barlow, J. (2016, June 28). What Constitutes a Quorum?. Board Portal Software | BoardEffect UK. https://www.boardeffect.com/en-gb/blog/what-constitutes-a-quorum/

Barnes, L., & Gatti, R. (2019, June). Bibliodiversity in Practice: Developing Community-Owned, Open Infrastructures to Unleash Open Access Publishing. ELPUB 2019 23rd Edition of the International Conference on Electronic Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4000/proceedings.elpub.2019.21

Behrens, J., & Deseriis, M. (2015, October 9). Liquid Democracy, its Challenges and its Forebears. OpenDemocracy. https://www.opendemocracy.net/en/can-europe-make-it/liquid-de/

Bilder, G. (2015, December 30). The Enclosure of Scholarly Infrastructure. OpenCon 2015. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oWPZkZ180Ho

Bilder, G., Lin, J., & Neylon, C. (2015). Principles for Open Scholarly Infrastructures-v1. https://doi.org/10.6084/M9.FIGSHARE.1314859

Bilder, G., Lin, J., & Neylon, C. (2020). The Principles of Open Scholarly Infrastructure. https://doi.org/10.24343/C34W2H

Blum, C., & Zuber, C. I. (2016). Liquid Democracy: Potentials, Problems, and Perspectives: Liquid Democracy. Journal of Political Philosophy, 24(2), 162–182. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopp.12065

Bookchin, M. (2015). The Next Revolution: Popular Assemblies and the Promise of Direct Democracy (D. Bookchin & B. Taylor, Eds.). Verso.

Bourg, C., & Levy, R. (2021, March 18). MIT Libraries and Faculty Committee on the Library System on UC-Elsevier Deal. MIT Libraries News & Events. https://libraries.mit.edu/news/libraries-faculty/31888/

Budroni, P., Claude-Burgelman, J., & Schouppe, M. (2019). Architectures of Knowledge: The European Open Science Cloud. ABI Technik, 39(2), 130–141. https://doi.org/10.1515/abitech-2019-2006

Campfens, Y. (2021, October 7). OA Switchboard’s self-assessment of the Principles of Open Scholarly Infrastructure (POSI). OA Switchboard Blog. https://www.oaswitchboard.org/blog7oct2021

CARE Principles of Indigenous Data Governance. (n.d.). Global Indigenous Data Alliance. Retrieved 27 March 2022, from https://www.gida-global.org/care

Carroll, L. (1884). The Principles of Parliamentary Representation. Harrison and Sons.

Chamberlain, A. (2020, October 4). Why is governance soooo boring?! The Institute of Association Leadership. https://theial.org/resource-hub/media/posts/why-is-governance-soooo-boring/

Chan, L. (2019, April 30). Platform Capitalism and the Governance of Knowledge Infrastructure. Digital Initiative Symposium, University of San Diego. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.2656601

Chan, L., Hall, B., Piron, F., Tandon, R., & Williams, W. L. (2020). Open Science Beyond Open Access: For and with communities,  A step towards the decolonization of knowledge. Canadian Commission for UNESCO. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3946773

Chen, G., Posada, A., & Chan, L. (2019). Vertical Integration in Academic Publishing: Implications for Knowledge Inequality. In P. Mounier (Ed.), Connecting the Knowledge Commons—From Projects to Sustainable Infrastructure: The 22nd International Conference on Electronic Publishing – Revised Selected Papers. OpenEdition Press. http://books.openedition.org/oep/9068

Chen, G. (Zhiwen), Mewa, T., Albornoz, D., & Huang, M. (2018). Geopolitical Inequalities Behind “Open” Infrastructures for Academic Knowledge Production. In G. (Zhiwen) Chen, Á. O. Álvarez Solís, G. Méndez Cota, M. Huang, D. Albornoz, T. Mewa, & Culture Machine (Eds.), The Geopolitics of Open (pp. 6–15). Post Office Press, Rope Press, and Culture Machine. https://hcommons.org/deposits/item/hc:19819/

Clough, P. T., & Willse, C. (Eds.). (2011). Beyond Biopolitics: Essays on the Governance of Life and Death. Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv11smsp0

Cocks, C. (2019, December 19). Diversity and Equity in Publishing: Triangle Scholarly Communication Institute | The H-Net Book Channel | H-Net. https://networks.h-net.org/node/1883/discussions/5581800/diversity-and-equity-publishing-triangle-scholarly-communication

Coggins, N. L., Fosado, G. C., Henry, C., & Manaktala, G. (2020). Towards Inclusive Scholarly Publishing: Developments in the University Press Community. Insights the UKSG Journal, 33, 15. https://doi.org/10.1629/uksg.506

Consensus Decision Making. (n.d.). Seeds for Change. Retrieved 1 May 2022, from http://www.seedsforchange.org.uk/consensus

COPIM. (2021). COPIM Statement on the Corporate Acquisition of OA Infrastructure. Community-Led Open Publication Infrastructures for Monographs (COPIM). https://doi.org/10.21428/785a6451.123ec90e

Crotty, D. (2019, August 1). Building for the Long Term: Why Business Strategies are Needed for Community-Owned Infrastructure. The Scholarly Kitchen. https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2019/08/01/building-for-the-long-term-why-business-strategies-are-needed-for-community-owned-infrastructure/

Crow, R. (2013). Sustainability of Open Access Services: Phase 3: The Collective Provision of Open Access Resources. Scholarly Publishing & Academic Resources Coalition. https://repository.jisc.ac.uk/6206/

De Angelis, M., & Stavrides, S. (2010). On the Commons: A Public Interview with Massimo De Angelis and Stavros Stavrides. E-Flux, 17. https://www.e-flux.com/journal/17/67351/on-the-commons-a-public-interview-with-massimo-de-angelis-and-stavros-stavrides/

Debat, H., & Babini, D. (2020). Plan S in Latin America: A Precautionary Note. Scholarly and Research Communication, 11(1), 12–12. https://doi.org/10.22230/src.2020v11n1a347

Dunbar-Hester, C. (2019). Hacking Diversity: The Politics of Inclusion in Open Technology Cultures. Princeton University Press.

Duşa, A., Nelle, D., Stock, G., & Wagner, G. G. (Eds.). (2014). Facing the Future: European Research Infrastructures for the Humanities and Social Sciences. Scivero Verl.

Eliot, T. S. (1920). The Sacred Wood: Essays on Poetry and Criticism. Methuen & Co. Ltd. https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/57795

Elwell, J., Emery, J., Hawkins, K., Kemp, J., Watkinson, C., Skinner, K., & Drummond, C. (2021). OAeBU Data Trust: 2022-2025 Governance Documentation for Initial Board of Trustees. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5703745

Enkhbayar, A. (2021, October 6). Beyond Open: Key Criteria to Assess Open Infrastructure. Invest in Open Infrastructure. https://investinopen.org/blog/criteria-to-assess-openinfra/

European Commission. (2017). EOSC Declaration. European Open Science Cloud. New Research & Innovation Opportunities. European Commission.

Eve, M. P., & Gray, J. (Eds.). (2020). Reassembling Scholarly Communications: Histories, Infrastructures, and Global Politics of Open Access. The MIT Press.

Fitzpatrick, K. (2019). Generous Thinking. Johns Hopkins University Press. https://jhupbooks.press.jhu.edu/title/generous-thinking

Fogel, K. (2022). Producing Open Source Software: How to Run a Successful Free Software Project (2nd edition). O’Reilly Media.

Frischmann, B. M., Madison, M. J., & Strandburg, K. J. (Eds.). (2014). Governing Knowledge Commons. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199972036.001.0001

Fyfe, A., Coate, K., Curry, S., Lawson, S., Moxham, N., & Røstvik, C. M. (2017). Untangling Academic Publishing: A History of the Relationship Between Commercial Interests, Academic Prestige and the Circulation of Research. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.546100

Gatti, R. (2018, October 5). Why OBP is not participating in KU Open Funding: And why libraries should understand the reasons. Open Book Publishers Blog. https://doi.org/10.11647/OBP.0173.0085

Graeber, D. (2004). Fragments of an Anarchist Anthropology. Prickly Paradigm Press : Distributed by University of Chicago Press.

Graeber, D. (2007). Possibilities: Essays on Hierarchy, Rebellion, and Desire. AK Press.

Graeber, D. (2011). Revolutions in Reverse: Essays on Politics, Violence, Art, and Imagination. Autonomedia.

Graeber, D. (2017). A Response to Anastasia Piliavsky’s The Wrong Kind of Freedom? A Review of David Graeber’s The Utopia of Rules: On Technology, Stupidity and the Secret Joys of Bureaucracy (Brooklyn/London: Melville House, 2015, 261 pages). International Journal of Politics, Culture, and Society, 30(1), 113–118. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10767-016-9248-0

Hall, G. (2021). Postdigital Politics: Or, How To Be An Anti-Bourgeois Theorist. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4589565

Hanganu, G. (2013, May 9). Voting in Meritocratic Governance Projects. OSS Watch. http://oss-watch.ac.uk/resources/meritocraticgovernancevoting

Harney, S., & Moten, F. (2013). The Undercommons: Fugitive Planning & Black Study. Minor Compositions.

Hawthorne, S. (2014). Bibliodiversity: A Manifesto for Independent Publishing. Spinifex Press.

Hudson-Ward, A. (2021, March 30). The Missed Moment to Elevate Open Access as DEIA Imperative. Choice 360. https://www.choice360.org/tie-post/the-missed-moment-to-elevate-open-access-as-deia-imperative/

IMLS Grant ‘It Takes A Village’: Open Source Software Models of Collaboration & Sustainability. (n.d.). Retrieved 27 March 2022, from https://www.lyrasis.org/programs/Pages/IMLS-OSS.aspx

Invest In Open Infrastructure. (2022). Defining Open Scholarly Infrastructure. https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ODB8jSDz7XcgqhjmhtyYKDQrbIbjffD_BAzYNwNnZsE/edit#

Irfanullah, H. (2022, January 24). The Other Diversity in Scholarly Publishing. The Scholarly Kitchen. https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2022/01/24/the-other-diversity-in-scholarly-publishing/

Jameson, F. (2004). The Politics of Utopia. New Left Review, 25, 35–54.

Joseph, H. (2018). Securing Community-Controlled Infrastructure: SPARC’s Plan of Action. College & Research Libraries News, 79(8). https://doi.org/10.5860/crln.79.8.426

Joseph, M. (2002). Against The Romance Of Community. University of Minnesota Press. https://muse.jhu.edu/book/31482

Joseph-Salisbury, R., & Connelly, L. (2021). Anti-Racist Scholar-Activism. Manchester University Press. https://manchesteruniversitypress.co.uk/9781526157959/

Joy, E. (2013, November 19). A Time for Radical Hope: Freedom, Responsibility, Publishing, and Building New Publics. In the Middle. https://www.inthemedievalmiddle.com/2013/11/a-time-for-radical-hope-freedom.html

Kember, S. (2014). Opening Out from Open Access: Writing and Publishing in Response to Neoliberalism. Ada: A Journal of Gender, New Media, and Technology. http://adanewmedia.org/2014/04/issue4-kember/

Knöchelmann, M. (2018, October 3). Knowledge Unlatched, Failed Transparency, and the Commercialisation of Open Access Book Publishing. LSE Impact Blog. https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2018/10/03/knowledge-unlatched-failed-transparency-and-the-commercialisation-of-open-access-book-publishing/

Larivière, V., Haustein, S., & Mongeon, P. (2015). The Oligopoly of Academic Publishers in the Digital Era. PLOS ONE, 10(6). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0127502

Lattemann, C., & Stieglitz, S. (2005). Framework for Governance in Open Source Communities. Proceedings of the 38th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2005.278

Lewis, D. W. (2017). The 2.5% Commitment. https://doi.org/10.7912/C2JD29

Lewis, D. W., Goetsch, L., Graves, D., & Roy, M. (2018). Funding community controlled open infrastructure for scholarly communication: The 2.5% commitment initiative. College & Research Libraries News, 79(3). https://doi.org/10.5860/crln.79.3.133

Lewis, D. W., Roy, M., & Skinner, K. (2018). The First Step Towards a System of Open Digital Scholarly Communication Infrastructure. https://scholarworks.iupui.edu/handle/1805/24200

LIBER. (2017, September 7). Open Access: Five Principles for Negotiations with Publishers. LIBER Europe. https://libereurope.eu/article/open-access-five-principles-for-negotiations-with-publishers/

LIBER, & Campbell, C. (2022, April 1). Four Urgent Recommendations for Open Access Negotiations with Publishers. LIBER Europe. https://libereurope.eu/article/four-urgent-recommendations-for-open-access-negotiations-with-publishers/

LIBER Citizen Science Working Group. (2021). Citizen Science Skilling for Library Staff, Researchers, and the Public. LIBER Citizen Science Working Group. https://doi.org/10.25815/hf0m-2a57

Lipmanowicz, H., & McCandless, K. (n.d.). Social Network Webbing. Liberating Structures. https://www.liberatingstructures.com/23-social-network-webbing/

Maryl, M., Błaszczyńska, M., Szulińska, A., & Rams, P. (2020). The Case for an Inclusive Scholarly Communication Infrastructure for Social Sciences and Humanities. F1000Research, 9, 1265. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.26545.1

Moore, S. A. (2020, April 17). Without stronger academic governance, Covid-19 will concentrate the corporate control of academic publishing. LSE Blog. https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2020/04/17/without-stronger-academic-governance-covid-19-will-concentrate-the-corporate-control-of-academic-publishing/

Moore, S. A. (2021a). Exploring Models for Community Governance. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4730687

Moore, S. A. (2021b). Open Access, Plan S and ‘Radically Liberatory’ Forms of Academic Freedom. Development and Change, 52(6). https://doi.org/10.1111/dech.12640

Moore, S. A., & Adema, J. (2020a). Community Governance Explored. Community-Led Open Publication Infrastructures for Monographs (COPIM). https://doi.org/10.21428/785a6451.20a5c646

Moore, S. A., & Adema, J. (2020b). COPIM Community Governance Workshop Recap: Part 1. Community-Led Open Publication Infrastructures for Monographs (COPIM). https://doi.org/10.21428/785a6451.6a3a2ca2

Moore, S. A., & Adema, J. (2020c). COPIM Community Governance Workshop Recap: Part 2 - On the Meaning of Community. Community-Led Open Publication Infrastructures for Monographs (COPIM). https://doi.org/10.21428/785a6451.dfe7dc68

Moore, S. A., Gray, J., & Lämmerhirt, D. (2016). Pasteur 40A briefing paper: Infrastructures for open scholarly communication. Pasteur4OA. https://apo.org.au/node/74506

Montgomery, L., Hartley, John, Neylon, Cameron, Gillies, Malcolm, Gray, Eve, Herrmann-Pillath, Carsten, Leach, Joan, Potts, Jason, Ren, Xiang, Skinner, Katherine, Sugimoto, Cassidy R., & Wilson, K., Huang, Chun-Kai. (2021). Policy. In Open Knowledge Institutions Reinventing Universities. MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/13614.003.0011

Morka, A., & Gatti, R. (2021). Academic Libraries and Open Access Books in Europe. A Landscape Study. COPIM & OPERAS. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4483773 & https://doi.org/10.21428/785a6451.f710a335

Moten, F., & Harney, S. (2011). Blackness and Governance. In P. T. Clough & C. Willse (Eds.), Beyond Biopolitics (pp. 351–361). Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822394235-015

Mouffe, C. (2005). The Return of the Political. Verso.

Mounier, P., Ferwerda, E., Dumouchel, S., Gatti, R., Gingold, A., Radovic, D., Smaniotto, A., Stojanovski, J., Vries, S. de, & Waaijers, L. (2018). OPERAS Platforms and Services White Paper. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1324059

Mudditt, A. (2020, October 28). In Search of Equity and Justice: Reimagining Scholarly Communication. The Scholarly Kitchen. https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2020/10/28/in-search-of-equity-and-justice-reimagining-scholarly-communication/

National Open Science Plan. (2019, April 17). Exemplarity Criteria for Funding from the National Open Science Fund through Platforms, Infrastructures and Editorial content. Ouvrir La Science. https://www.ouvrirlascience.fr/examplarity-criteria-for-funding-from-the-national-open-science-fund

Noble, S. U. (2018). Algorithms of Oppression: How Search Engines Reinforce Racism. New York University Press.

Okune, A. (2019, May 29). Decolonizing Scholarly Data and Publishing Infrastructures. Africa at LSE. https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/africaatlse/2019/05/29/decolonizing-scholarly-data-and-publishing-infrastructures/

Okune, A., Adebowale, S., Gray, E., Mumo, A., & Oniang’o, R. (2021). Conceptualizing, Financing and Infrastructuring: Perspectives on Open Access in and from Africa. Development and Change, 52(2). https://doi.org/10.1111/dech.12632

Okune, A., Hillyer, R., Chan, L., Albornoz, D., & Posada, A. (2019). Whose Infrastructure? Towards Inclusive and Collaborative Knowledge Infrastructures in Open Science. In P. Mounier (Ed.), Connecting the Knowledge Commons—From Projects to Sustainable Infrastructure: The 22nd International Conference on Electronic Publishing – Revised Selected Papers. OpenEdition Press. https://doi.org/10.4000/books.oep.9072

Open Source Alliance, & Hand, J. (2018). A Guide to Mission, Vision, and Strategy. In The Open Source Alliance for Open Scholarship Handbook. http://osaos.codeforscience.org/a-guide-to-mission/

Pawelzik, R., & Foulonneau, M. (2014). Governance Models for Online Communities—An Analysis of Communities Supporting Open Source Software Projects. ResearchGate. https://doi.org/10.13140/2.1.3345.1524

Perens, B. (2005). The Emerging Economic Paradigm of Open Source. First Monday. https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v0i0.1470

Peters, P. (2017, October 23). An Open Approach to Developing Infrastructure for Open Science. Hindawi. https://www.hindawi.com/post/a-radically-open-approach-to-developing-infrastructure-for-open-science/

Petrisin, A. (2018). Liquid Democracy and the Future of Governance. Kosmos Journal. https://www.kosmosjournal.org/kj_article/liquid-democracy-and-the-future-of-governance/

Pooley, J. (2017, August 15). Scholarly Communications shouldn’t just be Open, but Non-Profit too. Impact of Social Sciences. https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2017/08/15/scholarly-communications-shouldnt-just-be-open-but-non-profit-too/

Pooley, J. (2022). Surveillance Publishing. The Journal of Electronic Publishing, 25(1). https://doi.org/10.3998/jep.1874

punctum books. (n.d.). Vision Statement. https://punctumbooks.com/about/vision-statement/

Research Infrastructures in the Humanities: European Science Foundation. (n.d.). http://archives.esf.org/hosting-experts/scientific-review-groups/humanities-hum/strategic-activities/research-infrastructures-in-the-humanities.html

Resnick, P. (2014). On Consensus and Humming in the IETF (Request for Comments RFC 7282). Internet Engineering Task Force. https://doi.org/10.17487/RFC7282

Robinson, D. (2021, April 5). Developing Anti-Racist Nonprofit Governance. Code for Science & Society. https://blog.codeforscience.org/developing-anti-racist-nonprofit-governance/

Ross-Hellauer, T. (2016, June 5). Infrastructure is Invisible / Infrastructure is Law. OpenAIRE Blog. https://www.openaire.eu/blogs/infrastructure-is-invisible-infrastructure-is-law-1

Ruckstuhl, K. (2022). Trust in Scholarly Communications and Infrastructure: Indigenous Data Sovereignty. Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics, 6. https://doi.org/10.3389/frma.2021.752336

Schafer, V., & Wieneke, L. (2021). OPERAS-P Deliverable D6.1: Report on innovative models of governance. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4808411

Schiener, D. (2015, November 23). Liquid Democracy: True Democracy for the 21st Century. Organizer Sandbox. https://medium.com/organizer-sandbox/liquid-democracy-true-democracy-for-the-21st-century-7c66f5e53b6f

Schlosser, M., & Mitchell, C. (2019, February 6). Academy-Owned? Academic-Led? Community-Led? What’s at Stake in the Words we Use to Describe New Publishing Paradigms. Library Publishing Coalition Blog. https://librarypublishing.org/alpd19-academy-owned-academic-led-community-led/

Schneider, F. (2010). (Extended) Footnotes On Education. E-Flux, 14. https://www.e-flux.com/journal/14/61318/extended-footnotes-on-education/

Schneider, N. (2021). The Tyranny of openness: What happened to peer production? Feminist Media Studies, 0(0), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2021.1890183

Schroeder, R., & Siegel, G. (2006). A Cooperative Publishing Model for Sustainable Scholarship. Journal of Scholarly Publishing, 37(2), 86–98. https://doi.org/10.3138/jsp.37.2.86

Sheeran, M. J. (1983). Beyond Majority Rule: Voteless Decisions in the Religious Society of Friends. Philadelphia Yearly Meeting of the Religious Society of Friends.

Shorish, Y., & Chan, L. (2019, October 22). Co-creating Open Infrastructure to Support Diversity and Equity. ScholarLed Blog. https://blog.scholarled.org/co-creating-open-infrastructure

Sivanandan, A. (1990). Communities of Resistance: Writings on Black Struggles for Socialism. Verso.

Skinner, K. (2019, July 23). Why Are So Many Scholarly Communication Infrastructure Providers Running a Red Queen’s Race? Educopia Institute. https://educopia.org/red-queens-race/

Skinner, K., & Lippincott, S. (2020a). Assessment Checklist. CommonPlace. https://doi.org/10.21428/6ffd8432.5175bab1/00710d8a

Skinner, K., & Lippincott, S. (2020b). Values and Principles Framework and Assessment Checklist. Commonplace. https://doi.org/10.21428/6ffd8432.5175bab1

Skinner, K., & Wipperman, S. (2020). Living our Values and Principles: Exploring Assessment Strategies for the Scholarly Communication Field. Educopia Institute.

Star, S. L. (1999). The Ethnography of Infrastructure. American Behavioral Scientist, 43(3), 377–391. https://doi.org/10.1177/00027649921955326

Swartz, A. (2008). Guerilla Open Access Manifesto. http://archive.org/details/GuerillaOpenAccessManifesto

The Spokescouncil: A Decision-Making Pprocess for Large Groups. (n.d.). Seeds for Change. http://www.seedsforchange.org.uk/spokescouncil

Treloar, M. (2003, June). The Tyranny of Consensus. Clamor, 20, 38–40. https://ia800401.us.archive.org/33/items/clamormagazine20mult/clamormagazine20mult.pdf

Tsing, A. L. (2017). The Mushroom at the End of the World: On the Possibility of Life in Capitalist Ruins. Princeton University Press.

Valsangiacomo, C. (2021). Clarifying and Defining the Concept of Liquid Democracy. Swiss Political Science Review, 28(1), 61–80. https://doi.org/10.1111/spsr.12486

van Gerven Oei, V. W. J. (2020, March 19). Viral Open Access in Times of a Global Pandemic. punctum papers. https://punctumbooks.pubpub.org/pub/viral-open-access-global-pandemic-covid-19-corona/release/3

Watkinson, C., & Pitts, M. (2021, February 22). Re-Envisioning Humanities Infrastructure. Inside Higher Ed. https://www.insidehighered.com/views/2021/02/22/institutions-and-funders-must-recognize-contributions-university-presses-humanities

Waugh, C., & Carlisle-Johnston, E. (2022, April 27). Openwashing in Open Spaces: A Review of the Literature. Concordia University Library Research Forum 2022, online. https://sites.events.concordia.ca/sites/culrf2022/en/concordia-university-library-research-forum-2022/schedule/160/Openwashing%20in%20Open%20Spaces:%20A%20Review%20of%20the%20Literature

Wipperman, S., Martin, S., & Bowley, C. (2018). Balancing Influence in a Shifting Scholarly Communication Landscape: Creating Library-Owned, Community-Aligned Infrastructure Through Individual, Local, and Community Action. College & Research Libraries News, 79(5), 244–247. https://doi.org/10.5860/crln.79.5.244


Comments
0
comment

No comments here

Why not start the discussion?